Page 9 - SeptOct2020MFM.indd
P. 9

One problem with this kind of reasoning is that the broad   Sunk Cost Fallacy  -  Sometimes  we  invest  ourselves  so
     acceptance of some claim or action is not always a good   thoroughly in a program or project that we’re reluctant to
     indication that the acceptance is justi  ed. People can be  ever abandon it, even when it turns out to be fruitless and
     mistaken, confused, deceived, or even willfully irrational.   futile. It’s natural and usually not a fallacy to want to carry
     And when people act together, sometimes they become  on with something we   nd important, because of all the
     even more foolish ‘Mob mentality' can then rule and we   resources we’ve put into it. However, this kind of thinking
     are witnessing how destructive this can be with the new   becomes a fallacy when we start to think that we should
     phenomena of people with di  erent views being ‘cancelled’,  continue with a task or project because of all that we’ve put
     bullied or ‘doxed’ (doxing is where private information  into it, without considering the future costs we’re likely to
     about an individual is published with malicious intent).  incur by doing so.    ere may be a sense of accomplishment
      People can be quite gullible, and this fact doesn’t suddenly   when   nishing, and the project might have other values,
     change when applied to large groups.                   but it’s not enough to justify the cost invested in it. We
                                                            are susceptible to this errant behavior when we crave that
     Appeal to ignorance – argumentum and ignorantiam       sense of completion or a sense of accomplishment, we see
     – this is when ignorance is used as the major premise in   this type of fallacy within Masonry frequently.
     a supporting argument. Any time ignorance is used as
     a major premise in support of an argument, it’s liable to   “Sunk cost” is an economic term for any past expenses
     be a fallacious appeal to ignorance. Naturally, we are all   that can no longer be recovered. Psychologically, we are
     ignorant of many things, but it is cheap and manipulative   susceptible to this errant behavior when we crave that sense
     to allow this unfortunate aspect of the human condition to  of completion or a sense of accomplishment, or we are too
     do most of our heavy li  ing in an argument.           comfortable or too familiar with this unwieldy program or
                                                            project. Sometimes, we become too emotionally committed
     Appealing to ignorance isn’t proof of anything, except  to an “investment,” burning money, wasting time, and
     that you don’t know something! It even “works’ for     mismanaging resources to do it.
     contradictory claims, for example:
      •“No one has ever been able to prove de  nitively that   “I know this relationship isn’t working anymore and that
      extra-terrestrials exist, so they must not be real.”   we’re both miserable. No marriage. No kids. No steady
      •“No one has ever been able to prove de  nitively that   job. But I’ve been with him for seven years, so I’d better
      extra-terrestrials do not exist, so they must be real.”  stay with him.”
      Using an argument strategy to support mutually
      exclusive claims just shows that you don’t have a decent
      argument.

     Red Herring Fallacy - (ignoration elenchi). A Red Herring
     Fallacy attempts to redirect the argument to another   Reference Sources:
     issue  to which the person doing the redirecting can
     better  respond.    e  red  herring is  a deliberate diversion   1.    e Square Magazine, August 2020 Issue.
     of attention with the intention of trying to abandon the
     original argument. A “red herring fallacy” is a distraction   2. 15 Logical Fallacies You Should Know Before Getting
     from the argument typically with some sentiment that   into a Debate, TBS Sta  , June 9, 2020.
     seems to be relevant but isn’t really on-topic.    is tactic is
     common when someone doesn’t like the current topic and   3. Montana Masonic Manual, Section Four, Coach’s
     wants to detour into something else instead, something   Handbook.
     easier or safer to address. A red herring fallacy is typically
     related to the issue in question but isn’t quite relevant
     enough to be helpful. Instead of clarifying and focusing, it
     confuses and distracts.

         e phrase “red herring” refers to a kippered herring
     (salted herring-  sh) which was reddish brown in color
     and quite pungent. According to legend, this aroma was
     so strong and delectable to dogs that it served as a good
     training device for testing how well a hunting dog could
     track a scent without getting distracted. Dogs aren’t
     generally used for hunting   sh, so a red herring is a
     distraction from what he is supposed to be hunting.






      Montana Freemason                                                                       Page 9                                               Sept/Oct 2020   Volume 96 No. 5
   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14